This past April 2, the Secretary General of the PSOE, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero announced during the Federal Committee on April 2, which did not report that would not be the candidate PSOE for the upcoming general elections scheduled in early March 2012.
El Pais, Zapatero: "I will not be a candidate in the forthcoming general elections"
After seven years in office as Prime Minister, has been time to be doing or outline a balance of good and evil he has done in office José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, of its lights and shadows in government. That the decision has been sounded not doubt it, because not only Juanjo Millás dedicated the editorial of El País, but even in the daily "New York Times story appeared on Sunday 3 and the Monday, 4. Also British newspaper Financial Times headline saying that "over time the services are valued Zapatero for economic improvement.
After these days, you failed not on Facebook, has been putting this series of messages, which I copied and organized by topic. Toca
chest out, join ranks and defend everything that has been done. Every insult, a fact. He plays to win!
"Every insult that we receive, we a proposal. Each disqualification, an idea. And every exaggeration, a smile. Because that's what the public deserves"
EDUCATION Thank you for investing, for the first time in the history of Spain, 5% of GDP on education.
Thank you for taking the scholarships to the highest point of the country's history.
RESEARCH
Thanks for between 2005 and 2009, your government has invested in R + D + i, Eur 31,066 million, a 160.42% more than reversed the previous government. Thanks for the modernization.
ECONOMY
Thanks to increase social spending by 40%. Thanks in crisis because we were 20 points below the EU average debt. Is a key that allows us to get rid of what's wrong with Ireland and Greece
Thanks for investing the budget surplus to reduce public debt, although some will say it is not leftist or socialist have a surplus and invest it in reducing debt. Thanks. Thanks
because once you get in, chips phenomena Pedro Solbes, who made our government debt was lower than all European countries, including Germany. Thank you because if not for this, Spain, Greece and Ireland would today.
Thank you for not staying idly in the economic crisis, being brave, not to cut or health or education. Thanks for the hundreds of steps you have taken.
Thanks for a lower income tax and less progressive, more personal and family allowances and the first income tax rebate of democracy when the situation allowed (2006), so that each citizen pay an average of 6% less the Treasury. Thanks
because you have delivered us to be as Portugal, or worse yet, like Ireland or Greece. Thank you for not falling into demagogic game and save the country from utter collapse, even at the cost of your opinion, in the short term in the polls.
Thanks for placing and put Spain in the G-20, the group which brings together the 20 largest economies in the world, where major decisions are made that affect us all citizens, wherever we live.
WORK
Thank you for a 30% increase in the employment of people with disabilities
Thanks to suppress stuttering as a cause of exclusion from public employment Thanks
because in 2007, GOVERNING WITH YOU, it was the number of active people higher democracy (with work). And no, you do not destroy the work ...
Thanks for covering 75% of the unemployed (the highest point of unemployment protection of democracy) to 400 euros. Some reproach you unemployment. In their community is growing ever higher levels than average.
JUSTICE
Thanks for the new Penal Code of 2010, which aggravated the penalties for terrorism, as well as sex crimes and urban corruption WORK
Thank you for being courageous, labor reform and pensions.
INFRASTRUCTURE
Thanks for making Spain the country with more km of high speed. Thanks
to convert to renewable energies in the first energy source for our country.
HOUSING
Thanks to invest 323 million euros in access to housing for young people. Before you arrived zero million were invested
Thanks for the subsidized housing, which almost did not know until powered by law to build a minimum.
HEALTH
Thanks for uploading minimum pensions by 3% in 6 years
Thanks for the Assisted Reproduction Act, to cure sick siblings, and thanks for enhancing research with embryonic stem cells for research into diseases.
Thanks for the smoking ban.
Thanks to regularize the abortion, that is socialism.
Thanks for creating and providing the law of the Unit, that's socialism.
EQUALITY
Thanks for passing the law that recognizes sign language and free assistance to people with disabilities
Thanks for the check-baby and the return of 400 euros when the situation allowed .
Thanks for the Equality Act which extended paternity leave to 15 days
Thanks for forcing the parties to submit lists of candidates with at least 40% of women (and in positions with options).
Please specify prices in public tenders to companies with gender balance.
Thank you for making your first bill, which goes against gender violence
Thanks for creating the Law of Divorce Express. Thank you for deciding that there is no blame, no winners or losers.
Thanks for Marriage law between same sex, that is socialism.
IMMIGRATION
Thanks for the regularization of immigrants, and to legislate after under conditions not to go back a similar ordeal in a country having hundreds of thousands of people unprotected.
COMMUNICATION
Thank you for taking the 4700 million euros of debt that had all the television when you came to the Moncloa.
lobbies THANKS FOR NOT HAVING MEDIA!. Thanks for being independent, for being you and your word, not you and what the media tell you who you are. Thanks for making the Public Broadcasting is an example of a public information tool to serve the public. Neutral, realistic, not malipulado. Thanks.
DGT
Thanks for the penalty points, and take control of one of the scourges of our country, road deaths. Thank you that your government has ensured that we are no longer among the countries of Europe that most roads are dead.
ACT OF REMEMBRANCE
Thanks for Historical Memory, thanks for family members to know where they buried their dead.
AUTONOMOUS
Thanks for the new model of regional financing, thanks for giving more than 11,000 million to the autonomous communities con la reforma de la Ley de Financiación de las Comunidades Autónomas.
Gracias por afrontar, a pesar de las dificultades, los Estatutos. Nadie se atrevía, hasta que tú llegaste.
After seven years in office as Prime Minister, has been time to be doing or outline a balance of good and evil he has done in office José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, of its lights and shadows in government. That the decision has been sounded not doubt it, because not only Juanjo Millás dedicated the editorial of El País, but even in the daily "New York Times story appeared on Sunday 3 and the Monday, 4. Also British newspaper Financial Times headline saying that "over time the services are valued Zapatero for economic improvement. In its pros, it should be able to say that at first its mandate drew to a large number of enthusiasts and people excited about it, with that slogan "not fail us." Young people who had only met Mr. mustache that got us into a war without eating or drinking or ask anyone's permission, and which is still sometimes heard in some international forum saying something stupid English or some awful Texas against the Government of Spain. People who are dedicated to insult and offend. Insults as well Juanjo picked Millás back in 2006 when they began the peace process with ETA.
 |
| The poster Italian film, denouncing the harassment social Berlusconi in Italy says it all. |
the beginning of the legislature Zapatero represented in people a sense of hope, hope and freedom to cross borders and that was even reflected in the Italian film titled "Viva Zapatero" which represented the aspiration or desire for freedom of journalists and media the neighboring country Italy, be able to exercise their profession freely due to the high media control is exercised by Berlusconi . Although later won the "olive tree" (which represented the union of leftist forces) later returned to win the right to Berlusconi.
This illusion of freedom was embodied in the establishment of bases for the actual creation of the welfare state, a time of recognition of rights and freedoms, possibly comparable to the era that marked the transition, relatively speaking, of course . In recent years, all these advances and social rights have been truncated by a problem perhaps not expected by many but a few, who really know what's going on this world, ie the economic crisis. A difficult problem to explain and even understand, a problem that has hindered the credibility and the name of most major governments and leaders of Western countries, which has led to changes of governments that have made things even worse, if possible (see England, for example). But that's another story.
Without trying to be this far from a comprehensive examination or pretend not to be the culmination of all the management, at least it is a summary of the most known, measures that are there and must serve value, and that is why we must take stock of the big successes and big mistakes and roughly that's what I tried, and in doing so, sure I've left some important issue in the pipeline, which is why that may comment on the post, to write it afterwards.
This illusion of freedom was embodied in the establishment of bases for the actual creation of the welfare state, a time of recognition of rights and freedoms, possibly comparable to the era that marked the transition, relatively speaking, of course . In recent years, all these advances and social rights have been truncated by a problem perhaps not expected by many but a few, who really know what's going on this world, ie the economic crisis. A difficult problem to explain and even understand, a problem that has hindered the credibility and the name of most major governments and leaders of Western countries, which has led to changes of governments that have made things even worse, if possible (see England, for example). But that's another story.
Without trying to be this far from a comprehensive examination or pretend not to be the culmination of all the management, at least it is a summary of the most known, measures that are there and must serve value, and that is why we must take stock of the big successes and big mistakes and roughly that's what I tried, and in doing so, sure I've left some important issue in the pipeline, which is why that may comment on the post, to write it afterwards.
THE ADVANTAGES
- Withdrawal of troops from Iraq: The first step he took as President was to order the immediate withdrawal of troops it had sent the former PP government. Troops have been sent without consulting Congress, to participate in a war, an invasion that did not approve 92% of the citizens of Spain, to find a bomb of mass destruction that eventually proved that it does not even exist and had invented with the excuse to invade a foreign country to destroy and trade with the repair and extraction of oil.
- Equal : This law established the equality between men and women paying attention to redress inequalities in the specific field of labor relations, public employment, social media, etc. Since PP is that all this seemed well and had nothing else to do to use the law to the Constitutional Court because they did not agree that we had to put 60% of people of one sex and 40% of the other lists election.
- Equal : This law established the equality between men and women paying attention to redress inequalities in the specific field of labor relations, public employment, social media, etc. Since PP is that all this seemed well and had nothing else to do to use the law to the Constitutional Court because they did not agree that we had to put 60% of people of one sex and 40% of the other lists election.
- Gay Marriages Act: be the third country in the world to have this law can not tell anyone, and that and be one of the first to adopt the Law on Gender Identity "contributed greatly to the acceptance of the match between the LGBT and courage, and avant-garde that it showed" a decent society is one that does not humiliate its members "(ZP: 06/30/1905). This in turn Zapatero brought much criticism and ridicule among reactionary homophobic needless to recall, but they are always there.
- extension of abortion law : The previous 1985 law permitted abortion only during the first 12 weeks and only in cases of rape, malformation during the first 22 weeks, with no limit in case of risk physical health of the mother. With enlargement, the abortion was free until the 14th week of pregnancy until the 22 th if there is risk to the mother or fetal malformation. Then, and only if it is a serious or incurable disease of the fetus. The debate in the minors jumped from 16 to 18 years over whether they had to inform parents or not. It was stipulated that only one, or guardian, except that his communication would endanger the child. In contrast, for a change, the Conservatives and Catholics.
- The "Alliance of Civilizations" was an idea, a project that was proposed at the UN meeting and was welcomed by the then Secretary General Kofi Annan, which subsequently launched the next Secretary General, Ban Ki- moon.
- Law Unit: After education, health and pensions, the missing fourth pillar to support the welfare state was this. The law was supported by unions, employers, associations of older persons and persons with disabilities and all political parties except the nationalist parties. During the negotiations, all representatives of the Autonomous governed by the PP requested the postponement of the Act, but were told it was not going to delay anything and move on. Today, the CCAA where less is done are Madrid and Murcia.
- Allowance for unemployed of 426 €: In an effort to not let anyone who had lost their jobs in the gutter, the Government decided to give € 426 to those who have exceeded the 18 months of unemployment and continue not to work. In 2009, a total of 214,705 people benefited, reaching almost 80% at the end of the year.
ISSUES better revealed (or detail)
Without going into the success or the failure to name these or those Ministers or the suitability of these to display and perform such objections, I will try to make a collection of blunders that have taken place, duties and clearly could have done better not to give rise to much comment slanderers.
- Negotiating with ETA: Despite being good order, that is, stop terrorism for good (or bad), it erred when in late 2006 ETA announced about a year later and two days would be better off after the terrorist group had detonated a bomb in the T4 , thereby ending the peace process that had begun months ago to try to stop terrorism for good. That comment certainly exciting at the time, served to the public derision after the attack.
- Law of Historical Memory: Put this law here does not mean that the reason it was bad, in contrast, was great. But we had to expect that there are still people who live or lived very well with Franco and remove these issues always cause rashes, and finally, why deny it: the result was awful. Most associations demanded only one thing, repair and dignity. They wanted the annulment of the summary judgments, those judgments made illegal haphazardly, without any right of the accused. They wanted their dead relatives had not "legally" by the grace of an outlaw regime. They did not want money, and ultimately that was all that was offered, because the legislature (Jauregui) did not seem right to say that Franco's dictatorial regime was an illegal regime, and therefore all decisions, such as creating these courts to judge these people were illegal. True, there was a risk that by that token, also the appointment of Juan Carlos Prince of Asturias run the risk of being illegal, and therefore all currently be illegal because the beginning was flawed. Solution? Difficult, yes.
- The Plan E: The English Plan for stimulating the economy and jobs, invested 8,000 million euros in all municipalities in Spain through FEIL Funds, may finance the execution of works. Mimicking what was done in the U.S. when the Crash of 29, which was what John Keynes suggested that it was the state public who invest in private to put the machine back up, the goal was to create employment at a time product was falling at the explosion of the bubble created several years ago with brick (the problem is that this crisis is worse than 29). Thus, 426,000 jobs created or maintained in a time when the housing bubble was exploding and the concern was that as a result of job loss in this sector did not grow as unemployment rose so alarmingly. The second part of Plan E, were only 3,000 million, its goal was to help rehabilitation, automotive projects, nature conservation and projects I + D + i . This meant maintaining 100,000 jobs. We should add that the whole Plan E, also included FROB (funds to help banks to enhance their strength and solvency, they have to return money with interest), credit lines ICO (19,825,000 euros to 365,000 enterprises), 2000E plan to renew vehicles (500 € for giving dealers) and reduce CO2, or 70 miles. To renew bus €, 600 € for the revolving line-Tourism empowerment of rural tourism, 6,630 mill. € of aid to college for Masters, increased social spending, 2,050 mill. € to support the Unit, 1,312 mill. € to support the Housing Plan and Housing Plan Emancipation or OPV, in 2009-10 was spent 1,400 miles. € in scholarships or aid also of 426 € to long-term unemployed.
As an idea, as a project, all this was fine, the problem, the choice of the works in the municipalities, that once he knew the money would be received, had to decide what was spent. The choice of works and projects was a matter of local councils and approval if they meet the requirements and conditions, was a thing of the delegations of the Government in each community, a procedure that did not stop being hard to pass anything like paddle and skating. The criticism was then easy: Zapatero supports paddle. but who had actually decided to do these works?.
- Allowance for unemployed of 426 €: In an effort to not let anyone who had lost their jobs in the gutter, the Government decided to give € 426 to those who have exceeded the 18 months of unemployment and continue not to work. In 2009, a total of 214,705 people benefited, reaching almost 80% at the end of the year.
ISSUES better revealed (or detail)
Without going into the success or the failure to name these or those Ministers or the suitability of these to display and perform such objections, I will try to make a collection of blunders that have taken place, duties and clearly could have done better not to give rise to much comment slanderers.
- Negotiating with ETA: Despite being good order, that is, stop terrorism for good (or bad), it erred when in late 2006 ETA announced about a year later and two days would be better off after the terrorist group had detonated a bomb in the T4 , thereby ending the peace process that had begun months ago to try to stop terrorism for good. That comment certainly exciting at the time, served to the public derision after the attack.
- Law of Historical Memory: Put this law here does not mean that the reason it was bad, in contrast, was great. But we had to expect that there are still people who live or lived very well with Franco and remove these issues always cause rashes, and finally, why deny it: the result was awful. Most associations demanded only one thing, repair and dignity. They wanted the annulment of the summary judgments, those judgments made illegal haphazardly, without any right of the accused. They wanted their dead relatives had not "legally" by the grace of an outlaw regime. They did not want money, and ultimately that was all that was offered, because the legislature (Jauregui) did not seem right to say that Franco's dictatorial regime was an illegal regime, and therefore all decisions, such as creating these courts to judge these people were illegal. True, there was a risk that by that token, also the appointment of Juan Carlos Prince of Asturias run the risk of being illegal, and therefore all currently be illegal because the beginning was flawed. Solution? Difficult, yes.
- The Plan E: The English Plan for stimulating the economy and jobs, invested 8,000 million euros in all municipalities in Spain through FEIL Funds, may finance the execution of works. Mimicking what was done in the U.S. when the Crash of 29, which was what John Keynes suggested that it was the state public who invest in private to put the machine back up, the goal was to create employment at a time product was falling at the explosion of the bubble created several years ago with brick (the problem is that this crisis is worse than 29). Thus, 426,000 jobs created or maintained in a time when the housing bubble was exploding and the concern was that as a result of job loss in this sector did not grow as unemployment rose so alarmingly. The second part of Plan E, were only 3,000 million, its goal was to help rehabilitation, automotive projects, nature conservation and projects I + D + i . This meant maintaining 100,000 jobs. We should add that the whole Plan E, also included FROB (funds to help banks to enhance their strength and solvency, they have to return money with interest), credit lines ICO (19,825,000 euros to 365,000 enterprises), 2000E plan to renew vehicles (500 € for giving dealers) and reduce CO2, or 70 miles. To renew bus €, 600 € for the revolving line-Tourism empowerment of rural tourism, 6,630 mill. € of aid to college for Masters, increased social spending, 2,050 mill. € to support the Unit, 1,312 mill. € to support the Housing Plan and Housing Plan Emancipation or OPV, in 2009-10 was spent 1,400 miles. € in scholarships or aid also of 426 € to long-term unemployed.
As an idea, as a project, all this was fine, the problem, the choice of the works in the municipalities, that once he knew the money would be received, had to decide what was spent. The choice of works and projects was a matter of local councils and approval if they meet the requirements and conditions, was a thing of the delegations of the Government in each community, a procedure that did not stop being hard to pass anything like paddle and skating. The criticism was then easy: Zapatero supports paddle. but who had actually decided to do these works?.
- SINDE Law: Within a Act grandly called "Law of Sustainable Economy", which included another set of little rules, it was, no doubt became more famous than all the others. His sin, trying to regulate and control traffic and download files of type "cultural" fraudulent internet. Its purpose, ensure or warrant to some extent the rights of authors of such materials. The media, proposing a set of platforms to continue to be able to access such content in a way no "so free", without being prohibitively expensive, if available. Is this an outrage? In France and England there is piracy, because when the ISP detects these downloads and alerts you repeatedly cuts off internet. This law is not intended to go so against end users, but against the pages that provide resources. The controversy, that the proposed law to collect a commission complaints, and in principle to close these pages, the problem is that in Spain only a judge can close a web. The proposal, services like Spotify, which makes listening to music as often as they like in "streamming." The irony, which are now open to the U.S. market and the law here is different, and only you can hear a song 5 times for free.
- The check-baby: What was a very good proposal at the time, but smacked of electioneering, finally turned into economic chaos. The baby check was to give € 2,500 to couples who have a child, from July 2007 until January 1, 2011. The goal, boost the birth rate in Spain in the English families or residence in Spain. At this time, 1.5 million children and mothers had requested. The cost, about 4,000 million euros.
- Down 5% wage: In May 2010 decreased 5% for public employees (and 15% senior positions). The aim was to reduce public spending because the state recently had to bail out banks that risked breaking product that came from the U.S. crisis. So the banks asked for help, and now that he was wrong was the Government, banks, markets, showed no mercy, and called for drastic measures. This for a change, not adequately explained, and the group of officials (20% of workers in the country) was put on a war footing. He was said to be supportive, that the construction companies had already gone wrong. But it was either do this or that thousands of citizens lost their savings before. Should have said foreign investors lose their money?. Possibly, but what kind of country we have become so insecure?.
- Raise the retirement age to 67 years there who does not accept it directly, not wanting thinking, but if we sit and we take a population pyramid understand the demographic problem we have in Spain. Although right now there is no problem, yes they are perceived to be a problem in 20 years. If he had not done nothing, if we had followed the case, then more people in Spain have "passive" state claiming that "active" that produce wealth to maintain them, and this would obviously ruin. He was brave to tackle this problem that did not belong, and as always, is not sufficiently explained.
- maximum speed of 110 km / h: What could have been an agreed solution between technicians and politicians to try to curb the enormous expense Spain's energy and thereby save when buying fuel to third countries, became a "occurrence" over this government, which far from being well explained as this brings lower cost and thus saves both oneself and Spain in general, not But in the collective unconscious won the right argument that "this was to fine more people and collect more money."
Cases like the above as bad or nulamente explained motivated and have led to party supporters and citizens will turn their back left to disagree with these decisions.
NEGATIVE POINTS
Among negative points could be said that in recent times if anything has lost credibility Zapatero to the public and the public is largely because it has not been understood and agreed with the things he has done. Reasons have been.
- War in Afghanistan: could talk to follow in Afghanistan (even with a UN flag, because Obama said as we were leaving Iraq, which had to be a change there, and you hear the critics, that the peace mission has very little).
- Increased unemployment: undoubtedly move from 2 to 4.5 million is hard, and who can not see beyond, who have just come up, and the blame is for the boss at that time. I could get to scrutinizing the keys of this increase undoubtedly caused by the housing crisis and unemployment associated with his fall and argue that those who encouraged that so many people devoted to this world was the government of Aznar , but still remain true that the responsibility for "having had" the figure (the same even at the risk of operating more) would have been always the boss. It acted responsibly at this time to lower the price of housing and help those who wanted to buy and could not without having to speculate and the bubble burst. Or one or the other. The fact is that the boss always loses. A penalty that is so.
- The allowance of 400 €: At a time when having money, the problem is not circulating, it was suggested this measure. This was more or less the same as the check-baby, but only for workers and equally, charging what actually charged. In the 2008 election campaign, Zapatero promised to give this aid, to which the then Economy Minister Pedro Solbes did not totally disagree with it. At the end of the aid was not such but was left to raise through payroll, so who would not work as well. In June 2008, were allowed to retain € 200 and € 200 more over the next six months. The goal, which had more cash on families so they could spend and make money actually circulating in the market. The reality is that this was not noticed anything because subsequent crisis instead of spending what they did was spend with families save. But it was a real cut 5,700 million euros in revenue.
- Increased unemployment: undoubtedly move from 2 to 4.5 million is hard, and who can not see beyond, who have just come up, and the blame is for the boss at that time. I could get to scrutinizing the keys of this increase undoubtedly caused by the housing crisis and unemployment associated with his fall and argue that those who encouraged that so many people devoted to this world was the government of Aznar , but still remain true that the responsibility for "having had" the figure (the same even at the risk of operating more) would have been always the boss. It acted responsibly at this time to lower the price of housing and help those who wanted to buy and could not without having to speculate and the bubble burst. Or one or the other. The fact is that the boss always loses. A penalty that is so.
- communication policy
is possible, quite possible that if then instead of picking up and renew the Ministers in October 2010 making Rubalcaba Vice President to say that now they would be used to explain what had been done over the years, doing a small tour of Spain in small rallies which were only the very confident, but not the large number of electors of cities (what good is it then? of anything), I had taken and would have spent a little money on some advertising campaign for the media or fences advertising, which was simple but effective, most likely because that had not happened, or would have happened but would not draft much discouragement and hostility.
effectively in recent years communication policy of the Government of Zapatero was not bad not, that was awful, and possibly this has been his Achilles heel, and over the worst of all, you know. Over recent years, many files have been sent information, press releases ... information that almost always stayed in the post in charge of social groupings and never ended up going nowhere, because the groups have been more dead than anything else, because there was very little to discuss, and because the training and preparation militancy in such diverse fields which could range from knowing the statutes to understand a bill, or a balance sheet budget of a municipality, it has left very much to be desired.
Explain the management and decisions taken by the government was therefore in the hands of the press "independent? and "partisan", as well as militancy itself without having time to read all the documentation received in his post, ending sometimes accepting and believing the empty speech of the opposition. And if this has happened with the militants, with fans without the right to information and citizens ordinary, much more. All those potential voters passed by both the illusion to believe in politics to fill of a President who simply had gotten us into this crisis, because as we all know why this really what we have heard a million times, "guilt is Zapatero. "
NOW WHAT?
Now, as Zapatero has already announced his departure, the views can be heard are for everyone:
- In the PP some are happy because it no longer have opposite and if the economy is doing well as it seems, could still recover and win.
- Others, however, rejoice because there will be another person that the public will not know as much as Rajoy, so it is more likely to win (without having done or doing nothing). Interestingly, the main consequence has been that Zapatero has said he will not repeat, is that the PP and have asked for early elections, believing that the sooner (in addition because the economy will have recovered) better for them because the less time the next candidate for promotion. But this does not say, of course, say they now Zapatero is a lame duck (term used in the U.S. for U.S. president at the end of his second term because there are 8 years allowed by law), and the best thing you can do is this, that since not repeat, let him go at all, but now.
And in the PSOE since the same:
- There are those who do not finish the idea for fear of "what now" or who, and never quite get used to the idea of \u200b\u200bwhether will win, whether Rubalcaba, Chacón, Bono, the eternal Solana, Leguizamon, or other of the fifth Zapatero, as López Aguilar now Brussels walks.
- On the opposite side, also those who are happy because they felt that while before Zapatero had better image than the PSOE, was now reversed, and Zapatero and (very possibly due to poor communication and carried out therefore widespread weariness) is or was a burden for the party, and it was a problem for these local and regional elections of 2011, so if you wanted was to go, he said it before, so that "no affect "the results. This he understood, because although not believe in polls, they are there, and decided for the good of the party, so the envelope and announced his departure, although I had thought since 2004.
- Others, however, rejoice because there will be another person that the public will not know as much as Rajoy, so it is more likely to win (without having done or doing nothing). Interestingly, the main consequence has been that Zapatero has said he will not repeat, is that the PP and have asked for early elections, believing that the sooner (in addition because the economy will have recovered) better for them because the less time the next candidate for promotion. But this does not say, of course, say they now Zapatero is a lame duck (term used in the U.S. for U.S. president at the end of his second term because there are 8 years allowed by law), and the best thing you can do is this, that since not repeat, let him go at all, but now.
And in the PSOE since the same:
- There are those who do not finish the idea for fear of "what now" or who, and never quite get used to the idea of \u200b\u200bwhether will win, whether Rubalcaba, Chacón, Bono, the eternal Solana, Leguizamon, or other of the fifth Zapatero, as López Aguilar now Brussels walks.
- On the opposite side, also those who are happy because they felt that while before Zapatero had better image than the PSOE, was now reversed, and Zapatero and (very possibly due to poor communication and carried out therefore widespread weariness) is or was a burden for the party, and it was a problem for these local and regional elections of 2011, so if you wanted was to go, he said it before, so that "no affect "the results. This he understood, because although not believe in polls, they are there, and decided for the good of the party, so the envelope and announced his departure, although I had thought since 2004.
After these days, you failed not on Facebook, has been putting this series of messages, which I copied and organized by topic. Toca
chest out, join ranks and defend everything that has been done. Every insult, a fact. He plays to win!
"Every insult that we receive, we a proposal. Each disqualification, an idea. And every exaggeration, a smile. Because that's what the public deserves"
EDUCATION Thank you for investing, for the first time in the history of Spain, 5% of GDP on education.
Thank you for taking the scholarships to the highest point of the country's history.
RESEARCH
Thanks for between 2005 and 2009, your government has invested in R + D + i, Eur 31,066 million, a 160.42% more than reversed the previous government. Thanks for the modernization.
ECONOMY
Thanks to increase social spending by 40%. Thanks in crisis because we were 20 points below the EU average debt. Is a key that allows us to get rid of what's wrong with Ireland and Greece
Thanks for investing the budget surplus to reduce public debt, although some will say it is not leftist or socialist have a surplus and invest it in reducing debt. Thanks. Thanks
because once you get in, chips phenomena Pedro Solbes, who made our government debt was lower than all European countries, including Germany. Thank you because if not for this, Spain, Greece and Ireland would today.
Thank you for not staying idly in the economic crisis, being brave, not to cut or health or education. Thanks for the hundreds of steps you have taken.
Thanks for a lower income tax and less progressive, more personal and family allowances and the first income tax rebate of democracy when the situation allowed (2006), so that each citizen pay an average of 6% less the Treasury. Thanks
because you have delivered us to be as Portugal, or worse yet, like Ireland or Greece. Thank you for not falling into demagogic game and save the country from utter collapse, even at the cost of your opinion, in the short term in the polls.
Thanks for placing and put Spain in the G-20, the group which brings together the 20 largest economies in the world, where major decisions are made that affect us all citizens, wherever we live.
WORK
Thank you for a 30% increase in the employment of people with disabilities
Thanks to suppress stuttering as a cause of exclusion from public employment Thanks
because in 2007, GOVERNING WITH YOU, it was the number of active people higher democracy (with work). And no, you do not destroy the work ...
Thanks for covering 75% of the unemployed (the highest point of unemployment protection of democracy) to 400 euros. Some reproach you unemployment. In their community is growing ever higher levels than average.
JUSTICE
Thanks for the new Penal Code of 2010, which aggravated the penalties for terrorism, as well as sex crimes and urban corruption WORK
Thank you for being courageous, labor reform and pensions.
INFRASTRUCTURE
Thanks for making Spain the country with more km of high speed. Thanks
to convert to renewable energies in the first energy source for our country.
HOUSING
Thanks to invest 323 million euros in access to housing for young people. Before you arrived zero million were invested
Thanks for the subsidized housing, which almost did not know until powered by law to build a minimum.
HEALTH
Thanks for uploading minimum pensions by 3% in 6 years
Thanks for the Assisted Reproduction Act, to cure sick siblings, and thanks for enhancing research with embryonic stem cells for research into diseases.
Thanks for the smoking ban.
Thanks to regularize the abortion, that is socialism.
Thanks for creating and providing the law of the Unit, that's socialism.
EQUALITY
Thanks for passing the law that recognizes sign language and free assistance to people with disabilities
Thanks for the check-baby and the return of 400 euros when the situation allowed .
Thanks for the Equality Act which extended paternity leave to 15 days
Thanks for forcing the parties to submit lists of candidates with at least 40% of women (and in positions with options).
Please specify prices in public tenders to companies with gender balance.
Thank you for making your first bill, which goes against gender violence
Thanks for creating the Law of Divorce Express. Thank you for deciding that there is no blame, no winners or losers.
Thanks for Marriage law between same sex, that is socialism.
IMMIGRATION
Thanks for the regularization of immigrants, and to legislate after under conditions not to go back a similar ordeal in a country having hundreds of thousands of people unprotected.
COMMUNICATION
Thank you for taking the 4700 million euros of debt that had all the television when you came to the Moncloa.
lobbies THANKS FOR NOT HAVING MEDIA!. Thanks for being independent, for being you and your word, not you and what the media tell you who you are. Thanks for making the Public Broadcasting is an example of a public information tool to serve the public. Neutral, realistic, not malipulado. Thanks.
DGT
Thanks for the penalty points, and take control of one of the scourges of our country, road deaths. Thank you that your government has ensured that we are no longer among the countries of Europe that most roads are dead.
ACT OF REMEMBRANCE
Thanks for Historical Memory, thanks for family members to know where they buried their dead.
AUTONOMOUS
Thanks for the new model of regional financing, thanks for giving more than 11,000 million to the autonomous communities con la reforma de la Ley de Financiación de las Comunidades Autónomas.
Gracias por afrontar, a pesar de las dificultades, los Estatutos. Nadie se atrevía, hasta que tú llegaste.
0 comments:
Post a Comment