Guerrilla Quintana Roo military
A guerrilla in Quintana Roo
Lydia Cacho
"I do not care no scary me, on the contrary, I laugh, I'm thinking that these bastards really are afraid of me ", said General Carlos Bibiano Villa, the new Secretary of Public Security of Quintana Roo, referring to the Zetas. This 62-year military last month confessed murdering women and men on suspicion of belonging to criminal groups http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2011/03/13/index.php?section=politica&article = 007n1pol , is the same after receiving orders, sent the media a letter apologizing for the language in the interview, saying he defends human rights and enforce the law. Governor Roberto Borge said yes he believes to Bibiano, "I was recommended the Department of Defense and Isabel Arvide," said the young PRI without removing their thumbs and the look of your Blackberry.
Helguera
And you have to pay attention, because from Chihuahua to the Yucatan Peninsula, these soldiers take police forces to implement strategies of war in a country that Calderon has already said, "is not at war." So what does the general Bibiano in Quintana Roo? A few days ago explained that his mission to develop here, brought a team with high technology, valued at more than 4 million pesos, which paid out of pocket, has the capacity to intercept calls, detect movements "and other things you better not say are secret war. "monumental opacity warning says" in war is not asked permission, and it is involved. "
The same gentle smile a few weeks ago is making sure after "the thugs and pigs," said "mine is the urban guerrilla." He is an expert in telecommunications, entered the Army at age 16, received special training in intelligence and counterintelligence in Israel, has two bachelor's and master's degrees, and their statements are not a fluke. This military comes down hard on a state for two decades, has worked for a culture of human rights regardless of corrupt and greedy.
The urban guerrilla is usually a tactic of war that is usually taken by groups of fighters who are at a disadvantage against well-organized military forces (in this Zeta case). Is to avoid open confrontations with the enemy troops, looking for little fighting that there is no numerical superiority, and acts of sabotage. The goal is to inflict maximum casualties (killing) potential to weaken the enemy.
For the military trained in urban warfare techniques, two things are essential, says a colleague Bibiano: consider that the enemy is everywhere and act without notice (without judges to intervene through telephone lines or to arbitrary detention).
Gov. Mario Villanueva opened the door to drug and negotiations have been held stable successors. The airport security officials have said they will not work with Bibiano, since he is responsible for police patrols and to strengthen public safety and are not recognized for work in federal areas, such as combating organized crime and drug trafficking.
but to wonder I can not implement the urban guerrilla public safety? His outbursts make us understand that the general knows that in Quintana Roo was 0.8% of executions while in Chihuahua was 17.6, whereas in Quintana Roo felony rape in incidence is 40.9% compared with 19.6% of Chihuahua. Indexes highest criminal Quintana Roo sexual violence, domestic violence, manslaughter, robbery and threats, ie the common law dleitos not fold flat warfare tactics. The drug dealing is similar to other tourist and border states. All studies indicate that it urges the state to create a culture of peace and civility, improve the criminal proceedings, eliminating poverty, promoting ethical tourism, promoting culture, comprehensive policy on crime prevention with young people (for this work civic organizations for a decade.) However, a bully obsessed with war and narco said that "implement the public safety" with violence in our neighborhoods.
No doubt that should address the violence generated by drug trafficking and cartels, the federal nature of these crimes requires very specific strategies and transparent at the same time, the PGR and SIEDO, institutions responsible for investigating and prosecuting federal crimes against health. This task does not belong to a local Public Security Secretary, first because instead of strengthening the institutions of further undermined conduct military intelligence work is not regulated or supported by federal or state, and secondly because that is military (retired) does not mean you have passed the tests of federal trust, requiring mental health, honesty, transparency and adherence to the law, among other key factors. Thirdly, because the instability that organized crime has generated policacas institutions, can only compensate with teamwork, transparency and adherence to the law. What the general Bibiano Villa offers is the opposite: to work just because everyone distrusts local minutes, including members of the State Security Council (threatened one of them and left the state), this council was legally created as a counterweight fair of abuse of power and the transition to the new Criminal Justice System approved by Congress in 2006. Finally Bibiano Villa has neither the power nor the ability to investigate and support staff close to his own boss (the Governor of Quintana Roo) and the members of his cabinet, including the Attorney General (who investigative journalism and of SIEDO have been identified as negotiator between the state government and cartels.)
I live in Quintana Roo since 1986, I have friends who have fled from Playa del Carmen and Cancun for fear of threats and extortion by the Zetas, I have received threats direct them, and our Service Center victims, which for a decade has rescued hundreds of survivors of extreme violence and defended the victims of organized crime, has consistently denounced the damage that organized crime makes the social fabric. No doubt the urgency limit organized crime in Quintana Roo, but the presence of General Bibiano Villa, his speech and Governor Borge, simple makeup is clearly a problem that requires a multisectoral approach and transparent. There duficiente evidence to show that military retirement as Bibiano Villa have only havoc in other states; murder suspects is not the answer, generate social peace and a culture of legality and human rights is the key. In this context, the militarization of police is unacceptable, and fear can not stop us from saying it out loud: violence is not the way to security and justice.
Voyeur
____________________________________
Mexico: PAN and PRI Legalize repression against social movements, as in Colombia?
Pedro Echeverria V.
1. PRI and PAN have submitted a draft opinion to Members to reform the National Security Act giving space to the president to order and declare the intervention of armed forces against "movements or conflicts of a political, electoral, social or labor, if it considers that" are a challenge or threat "to security. Include attribution to the military, marine and Cisen agents for phone tapping, spying and tracking suspected members of organized crime and integrate confidential files, even political.
2. Gives the military the right to restrict the movement of goods and vehicles, review of private belongings on the street and requested information in "any tool that is necessary" and can rely on anonymous informants and use of any method of data collection. However it seems that some factions of the PRI and the PRD warned that the Senate will not pass an amendment to the Homeland Security Act that allows the president Felipe Calderón to move towards the militarization of the country, as outlined in the draft opinion of the House of Deputies. Identical to what happened in Colombia.
3. "If approved, Tomás Torres said the PRD would be like a coup d' State law in hand, because the minutes of National Security Act was passed in the Senate on April 27, 2010, eliminated the excessive powers to both the Army and the federal executive, and those aspects that shaped the transition to a militarized state. " Hopefully the social movement, the Zapatistas or amloísmo have any response or any sector of lawmakers who still has some dignity, to call around. It looks very difficult to stop this fascist measure outlawing or criminalizing the social struggle on the pretext of "combating insecurity."
4. But if there is no social movement to respond through the mobilization of these measures of repression, imprisonment and murder, there is no way to feel defeated and made to mourn, it might be better to think of that popular saying that "there is an ill wind that blows no good", that if you close the door of your house by the entrance , you have to go but breaking the back door. The rotten and stinking media will not rest, as they have always done, to condemn "violence" from below and silence the brutal repression of the above. But do not be afraid for where the hunger grows and dignity appears, every fight is fair.
5. Perhaps the best people and their representatives, with the extreme fascist measures implemented by the government and begin to convince businesspeople that do not fit and other ways that the organization and armed violence. That happened in the sixties, almost 50 years in Colombia and other Latin American countries, Asia and Africa, resulting in a large continental insurgency movement. What the hell can the people when you ban together, when they suffer spying at home, at work, school, phone and Internet? PAN and PRI are in complete agreement on fundamental issues and the pursuit of social control is essential to them.
6. These "anti-terrorist laws that now rages in Mexico are due to U.S. policy implemented by Obama-Clinton worldwide, on all these days of U.S. presidential election. In Argentina this statement: "I want to say about the Patriot Act that we have in our country. This law exists to direct pressure from Washington. These Yankees are not stupid that when a country militarily invading what they sticking their noses into issues that would not necessarily care. At the end of the day, his motive is the same: invade, conquer, expand ... shares of an Empire and one so sick over the U.S..
7. What a cynical!: As is universally known because it has been written many times: The U.S., which throughout history has exported terrorism as a policy of international domination, which from the military training schools of the Americas Army teaches how to implement state terrorism to ensure the privileges of the sectors of power allies of the U.S. interests in the region, imposes far, through this continental law, the unilateral view of terrorism. The main terrorist in the world, the U.S. government and its allies, Colombia and Mexico first, kill social activists with the label of terrorist.
http://pedroecheverriav.wordpress.com
_____________________________________
ACT NOW, THEN BE AFTERNOON. REJECTION OF NATIONAL SECURITY LAW.
The parliamentary groups of the PAN and the PRI issued a draft opinion in the House of Representatives to reform the National Security Act. This bill modifies terms of the reform in the sense that the President requested the intervention of armed forces against movements of political, electoral, social or work when it deems a threat to internal security. This reform also gives powers to the military, marine and CISEN for spying. The Act puts in the same classification for organized crime and political movements, social and electoral. Allows the Army to review the belongings of individuals in the streets and to request information use "any tool that is necessary." Army provides anonymous informants and use "any method of collecting information." Under the concept of "social prevention" aims to reform the citizenship required to cooperate in criminal investigations and the military. This would mean a suspension of guarantees without the need for state of emergency decree.
reform states only respect for human rights, but it opens the door to be violated in a "legal." There are contradictions in the approach to reform in conjunction with the time you are willing to adopt us to believe that the intention behind is not only the fight against organized crime but the way to a coup through legislation and the establishment of a police state. This reform is intended to be adopted before 30 April, during the holiday period.
reform is in the hands of committees by:
Government Commission
Dip. Javier Corral Jurado (PAN)
javier.corral @ congreso.gob.mx
Tel: (55) 50360000 ext.
57130 Twitter: @ Javier_Corral
Public Safety Commission
Dip. José Luis Ovando Patrón (PAN)
jose.ovando @ congreso.gob.mx
Tel: (55) 50360000 ext.
51217 Twitter: @ JLOvandoP
National Defense Commission
Dip. Rogelio Cerda Pérez (PRI)
rogelio.cerda @ congreso.gob.mx
Tel: (55) 50360000 ext.
66004 Twitter: @ rogeliocerda
Dip
Justice Commission. Victor Humberto Benítez Treviño (PRI)
victor.benitez @ congreso.gob.mx
Tel: (55) 50360000 ext.
57148 Twitter: @ HumbertoBeniTre
Human Rights Commission
Dip. Manuel Cadena Morales (PRI)
manuel.cadena @ congreso.gob.mx
Tel: (55) 50360000 ext.
66318 Twitter: @ manuelcadena38
1. Send from this time Twitter messages to email and the chairmen of the committees responsible for saying, reject the amendment to the Homeland Security Act and the establishment of a State Police-Military!
2. Call from Monday April 25 at 8:00 pm at the phone numbers of committee chairmen responsible for saying: I call because I reject the amendment to the Homeland Security Act and the establishment of a State Police-Military
0 comments:
Post a Comment